總網頁瀏覽量

【○隻字片羽○雪泥鴻爪○】



○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○

既然有緣到此一訪,
何妨放鬆一下妳(你)的心緒,
歇一歇妳(你)的腳步,
讓我陪妳(你)喝一杯香醇的咖啡吧!

這裡是一個完全開放的交心空間,
躺在綠意漾然的草原上,望著晴空的藍天,
白雲和微風嬉鬧著,無拘無束的赤著腳,
可以輕輕鬆鬆的道出心中情。

天馬行空的釋放著胸懷,緊緊擁抱著彼此的情緒。
共同分享著彼此悲歡離合的酸甜苦辣。
互相激勵,互相撫慰,互相提攜,
一齊向前邁進。

也因為有妳(你)的來訪,我們認識了。
請讓我能擁有機會回拜於妳(你)空間的機會。
謝謝妳(你)!

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●



2019年5月29日 星期三

Forest 500 Annual Report 2018: the Countdown to 2020


https://forest500.org/forest-500-annual-report-2018-countdown-2020

Forest 500 Annual Report 2018: the Countdown to 2020

Executive Summary
Our growing global appetite for consumer goods is driving the loss of the world’s tropical forests. Yet these forests are essential to address climate change, provide crucial habitat for biodiversity and enhance water security. Five years ago, companies and governments signed up to the New York Declaration on Forests, committing to eliminate deforestation from agricultural supply chains by 2020. 
As the 2020 deadline approaches, not one of the Forest 500 companies and financial institutions assessed in 2018 is on track to eliminate commodity-driven deforestation from their supply chains and portfolios by next year. Yet nearly half have made commitments to do so by 2020 or earlier. 
The Forest 500 ranking assesses the 500 most influential companies and financial institutions in forest-risk commodity supply chains, focusing on palm oil, soy, cattle and timber products. Each year, the Forest 500 ranking assesses their policies and commitments to address deforestation, holding them to account for their impacts on forests. 
These 500 companies and financial institutions have the greatest potential to prevent tropical deforestation. Despite the commitments that have been made, evidence shows that rates of commodity-driven deforestation have not decreased [1].
In recognition of this gap between company commitments and impacts on the ground, the Forest 500 methodology was updated in 2018 to better distinguish between companies who have set commitments, and those that have taken the next step
towards implementation. This new methodology has meant that many companies have received lower scores this year. 
This report identifies the leaders, both overall and for each commodity assessed, and looks at progress among companies and financial institutions, identifying where common gaps lie. It also shows that there is an urgent need to prioritise deforestation in agricultural commodity supply chains. The 2020 goal cannot be met, but action is still needed.
Read the full report here
Leader boards showing top five retailers
Top scoring retailers in the 2018 Forest 500 assessment
Key findings:
● The 2018 assessment shows that some leading companies have strong commitments which do include actions on implementation. Fifty of the 350 assessed companies report some implementation activities for all of the commodities they
are exposed to. Other companies need to follow the example of these leading companies. 
● Every year the number of companies with commitments to protect forests increases. In 2018, we found that 57% of companies had a commitment to protect forests for at least one of the commodities they are exposed to, up from 50% in 2014. 
● Many of the companies with commitments are not tackling all of the risks they are exposed to. Thirty seven percent of companies have a commitment for one or more but not for all of the forest-risk commodities in their supply chains. 
● Even companies with ambitious commitments are not putting these into practice. Of the 228 companies assessed in 2017 and 2018, nearly 70% scored lower this year than last year, due to the new indicators on implementation. This reflects
an implementation gap - companies are not executing their commitments. 
● Far too many of the most influential companies in these supply chains still have no commitments at all, or commitments that are too weak to deliver change on the ground. Over 40% of the most influential companies are not doing anything to tackle deforestation that they are linked to. 
● Palm oil remains the commodity with the greatest action - companies are more likely to have strong commitments and report on implementation for palm oil than for any other commodity. But there is still room for improvement: most
companies, including the leading companies, do not report  protecting High Carbon Stock forests or peatlands. 
● Cattle products are still overlooked. Only 16% of companies have a forest-related commitment for beef or leather that they produce or source. 
● Financial institutions are behind companies in setting commitments and policies on deforestation. Of the 150 financial institutions assessed, nearly two thirds had no financing policy for any of the four key forest-risk commodities.
Of the 53 that do, none score 4 or 5 out of 5 for their policies. 
Read the full report here
Table shows top five manufacturing companies in Forest 500 2018 assessment
The top scoring manufacturing companies in the 2018 Forest 500 assessment
Key asks:
● Companies need to assess their exposure across forest-risk commodities, and set and implement strong commitments that address each commodity.
● Companies must put more focus on implementing their commitments with clear action plans, including monitoring supplier and producer compliance, and detailing policies for dealing with non-compliance. 
● Action plans should include realistic time-bound milestones which are monitored and reported against. These plans must tend beyond 2020 and remain ambitious, with all aspects of the commitments reported on, to ensure companies
themselves and others can measure progress against their milestones. 
● Financial institutions need to do more to recognise and act on the material risk that deforestation poses. They should require their portfolio companies to adopt and implement policies that mitigate these risks.

沒有留言: