總網頁瀏覽量

【○隻字片羽○雪泥鴻爪○】



○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○

既然有緣到此一訪,
何妨放鬆一下妳(你)的心緒,
歇一歇妳(你)的腳步,
讓我陪妳(你)喝一杯香醇的咖啡吧!

這裡是一個完全開放的交心空間,
躺在綠意漾然的草原上,望著晴空的藍天,
白雲和微風嬉鬧著,無拘無束的赤著腳,
可以輕輕鬆鬆的道出心中情。

天馬行空的釋放著胸懷,緊緊擁抱著彼此的情緒。
共同分享著彼此悲歡離合的酸甜苦辣。
互相激勵,互相撫慰,互相提攜,
一齊向前邁進。

也因為有妳(你)的來訪,我們認識了。
請讓我能擁有機會回拜於妳(你)空間的機會。
謝謝妳(你)!

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●



2021年10月31日 星期日

Want to make a success of hybrid working? 3 things to focus on


Want to make a success of hybrid working? 3 things to focus on

many people, like this man working from home here, are now asking for hybrid, flexible working models
“I really believe workers are well-intentioned, and if given the tools, empowerment, and support, they will not only perform for you—they will thrive,” - Tsedal Neeley
Image: UNSPLASH/Ian Harber
This article was originally published byHarvard Business School Working Knowledge
  • Some business leaders want a return to office life, while workers are asking for more flexibility.
  • Below, Tsedal Neeley offers 3 key pieces of advice about how leaders can navigate their long-term plans for hybrid work.

The COVID-19 pandemic made remote work more the norm than the exception, and now many companies are struggling to map out a hybrid plan that both managers and employees can embrace long term.

With return-to-work policies in flux, this is “a fragile period” in which business leaders may feel tempted to revert back to the old status quo of office life, but it could be a mistake to impose a pre-pandemic mentality on a post-pandemic reality, says Harvard Business School Professor Tsedal Neeley. She has been studying remote, virtual, and global work for more than two decades.

“We’re in a moment in the history of work where the nature of work as we’ve known it has been disrupted, whether we embrace it or not,” says Neeley, author of Remote Work Revolution: Succeeding from Anywhere. “All or nothing is easy, when all are in the office or all are remote. But with hybrid work, it’s a mix of in-office and remote, and we’ve entered a gray zone in which people are asking, ‘What will permanent look like?’ It’s comfortable to think of our remote work environment as temporary; it’s much more difficult to think about what long term should look like and how to do it right.”

One thing is certain: Most employees are seeking a permanent change to their schedules. A recent HBS Online survey found that more than 80 percent of employees prefer working from home at least part of their week. And a recent McKinsey survey found that 90 percent of companies are willing to accommodate them with plans for hybrid workplaces.

"You have to trust that they are intelligent enough and well-intentioned enough to get work done."

Just how flexible should companies be? That’s a question many business leaders are wrestling with as they try to balance the needs of the business with the preferences of their employees. Applying lessons gleaned from decades of research, along with the shared reality of millions of workers over the past several months, Neeley says managers should keep three things in mind as they develop long-term plans for hybrid work.

1. Trust in employee autonomy

While working from home, employees have enjoyed an unprecedented sense of agency and autonomy, crafting schedules that often diverge from the typical nine-to-five. Contrary to some expectations—but consistent with years of research—that flexibility has actually spurred worker productivity to improve. In polls that Neeley has taken at companies in a variety of industries, 70 percent reported increased productivity among workers during the pandemic.

“You have to trust that they are intelligent enough and well-intentioned enough to get work done no matter what it takes,” she says.

This means managers should be careful not to treat workers like children by strictly dictating when and where they should work. For example, mandating that workers suffer through a long and expensive commute to show up to the office a certain number of days a week, just to toil away solo in their cubicles, doesn’t fly anymore, Neeley says.

a chart showing the top reasons why people enjoy remote working
5 reasons why employees like hybrid working.
Image: Microsoft


"We have this notion that we need to see people in order to determine their performance."

“All of the early data show that when people are forced into the office, they resent it. They say, you trusted me during the pandemic. Why don’t you trust me now?”

That’s not to say that workers should have complete control of their schedules. During times when colleagues need to work on certain tasks—for innovation, specific collaboration needs, or team building—meeting in person may be preferable. But rather than dictate a one-size-fits-all approach, Neeley says, business leaders should allow individuals and managers to figure out the schedules that work best for their particular teams.

“Sometimes you need to be shoulder-to-shoulder to collaborate,” Neeley says, “but you have to trust people will show up when they need to.

2. Stop counting ‘butts in seats’

As a corollary to trusting in workers, managers must also change the way they measure employee performance, Neeley says.

“We have this notion that we need to see people in order to determine their performance,” she says. “It’s the old belief, that so long as they are visible, they are demonstrating and asserting their commitment.”

This emphasis on “butts in seats” has always been misguided, she says, but never more so than now, when employees are working in remote or hybrid environments far from the eyes of watchful supervisors. Attempts to reassert the “butts in seats” metric by using awareness technology software to measure computer keystrokes or monitor time spent idle is a “disaster,” Neeley says.

“It’s surveillance—and those who have been recipients of it say that it’s humiliating,” she says.

"it became really important for managers to ask, ‘how’s it going? how are you doing? how can I help?"

Instead, Neeley takes a page from the late J. Richard Hackman, an organizational psychology expert at Harvard, by proposing that managers shift to three key measures of performance: results, group cohesion, and employee learning and satisfaction.

Focusing on those measures, she says, ensures managers are tracking what is actually being accomplished, rather than micromanaging what looks like a productive workday. At the same time, employees must be trained to regularly communicate their progress to keep managers in the loop.

3. Support work-life wellbeing

One of the unexpected outcomes of the pandemic has been a newfound appreciation for people’s humanity, with managers giving new consideration to personal challenges, Neeley says.

“It became really important for managers to ask, ‘How’s it going? How are you doing? How can I help?’” As life begins to normalize, Neeley urges managers to retain that emphasis on employee well-being. “When people are working from home, they are giving up actual real estate in their households to their companies,” Neeley says. “The least you can do is care about how they are.”

While people may have hesitated to talk about their responsibilities at home prior to the pandemic for fear that they may not appear fully committed to their work, at this point they should feel free to continue sharing any work-related conflicts they may be facing. And managers should listen so they can better accommodate people’s individual circumstances when possible.

Research has shown that encouraging those measured disclosures and respecting employees’ boundaries can help create trust among co-workers, as well as induce a sense of commitment in workers who feel like their well-being is valued. “It shows managers are meeting the moment and seeing people and supporting them,” Neeley says. “Do you think they are gaining loyalty? Absolutely.”

Give your employees what they need

Much of Neeley’s advice for the new office reality comes down to giving workers the space they need and then trusting them to do their best work. Those lessons, she says, apply in the same way no matter where they are working, whether in the office or in their own homes.

“I really believe workers are well-intentioned, and if given the tools, empowerment, and support, they will not only perform for you—they will thrive,” Neeley says. “We need to trust ourselves, trust our people, and increase our skills on how to lead both in the office and virtually.”

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum Type may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

Navigating the emotional rollercoaster of climate change


Navigating the emotional rollercoaster of climate change

this woman here is looking sad and reflective. People are increasingly struggling with the 'emotional rollercoaster' of climate change
'A day has not gone by since late 2019 that there hasn't been something that's come out about the topic of climate change and anxiety, grief, mental health or wellbeing.'
Image: UNSPLASH/Isabela Drasovean
This article first appeared onGreenBiz
  • Climate psychologist Dr. Renee Lertzman is working with companies such as Google, VMware and Unityto to support organizations through the personal and professional challenges of climate change.
  • Her advice is outlined below.

Imagine a semi-truck is barreling towards us. We can see it coming, so I try to move us away from its collision course. Your response wouldn’t be, "Wow, Lauren, you’re really passionate about 16 wheelers! Have you always been such a gearhead? I’m so happy you have this passion." Certainly not. You would join me to step aside and avoid the imminent catastrophe.

This anecdote — borrowed from a recent episode of the podcast "This American Life" — captures what it can feel like to work in the field of sustainability and climate change solutions. As a looming, existential threat comes barreling towards us, it’s our job to push through the anxiety-inducing reality, get everyone else to take it seriously and do something about it before it’s too late.

Dr. Renee Lertzman is an expert on this type of existential change management — the practice, strategies and tools needed for organizations to confront an existential threat such as climate change.

A climate psychologist, researcher and strategist, Lertzman works with companies such as Google, VMware and Unity to apply psychological and social science research to engage with these complex and overwhelming challenges, and mobilize towards solutions. She recently founded Project Inside Out, an online hub and set of tools and resources to support people working on climate.

Lertzman is speaking this week at VERGE 21 on the keynote stage alongside Michiel Bakker, Google’s vice president of global workplace programs, on leadership and rethinking the hope and despair binary. I’ll also be interviewing Lertzman in an interactive "Ask an Expert" session on balancing climate anxiety and action. In advance of these conversations, I sat down with Lertzman to discuss the complexity of working in sustainability and leading through the emotional rollercoaster of climate change.

a chart showing how climate psychology works
Climate change can caused psychological stress.
Image: Nature

Phipps: What does it mean to be a climate psychologist and professionally engage with climate anxiety?

Lertzman: My work is not about everyone sitting in a circle and just talking about your feelings, processing your feelings and then going off and saving the world. It’s much more about understanding what it means to be an effective practitioner today and in the future. We have to level up our emotional intelligence. And we have to create more norms in our sector where we can talk about when it's time to slow down, when it's time to take a pause. You know, bringing more reflection in in order to go faster.

How do we work with our own anxiety, our own anger, our own feeling overwhelmed, our own complicated relationship with hope and optimism?

You can't separate the human dimension of what is being asked of us in terms of change. It’s change work and change management.

PhippsPeople often throw around the phrase "emotional intelligence." What does that mean for people working on climate solutions?

Lertzman: When I say "emotional intelligence," I don’t mean "be more emotional." My experience is that the sustainability sector has been dominated by strong feelings, people who have such a profound sense of urgency, passion and commitment. It can override and take over, and can therefore lead others to experience them as an activist or too intense.

Emotional intelligence is fundamentally about asking: How do we work with our own emotional relationship with our work and with the issues? How do we work with our own anxiety, our own anger, our own feeling overwhelmed, our own complicated relationship with hope and optimism? How do we work with that effectively?

The next part of it is to ask: How do we meet people where they are? And how do we bring a quality of empathy and compassion into every aspect of our work?

It's very hard to do that when you're trying to drive an agenda for change. And if you add to that targets, and add to that goals, and add to that objectives and key results — and oh yeah, the friggin' climate is changing and we've got like 10 years. If you add all of that together, it creates such an incredible sense of urgency and pressure that can make it very hard for people working in the space to actually access the ability to say, "I wonder how my operational team is experiencing what I'm asking them to do?" It's very hard when the pressure is so intense.

Phipps: How has the broader conversation around climate anxiety changed over the last two years since your TED Talk?

Lertzman: It’s completely exploded. Without exaggeration, a day has not gone by since late 2019 that there hasn't been something that's come out about the topic of climate change and anxiety, grief, mental health or wellbeing. It's really shifted and it’s now much more normalized to talk about these things. But we haven't yet figured out what to do with all of this talk about anxiety and fear and grief. That's where I see a massive need and opportunity for organizations to take this on.

Phipps: Project Inside Out offers an invitation for sustainability practitioners to think differently about the work that we do. Can you describe what that looks like?

Lertzman: People in this space have a very strong reflex to "right" people. They say, "This is the right thing to do, we've got so much at stake, and don’t you care about the planet?" But this is highly ineffective. It actually triggers people's ambivalence, it triggers people's resistance to change even despite our best interest.

We contrast this with "guiding," when you approach people in a relationship of respect, of honoring the other's integrity. And fundamentally, you're not trying to change the other person. You're guiding.

We assume that we get results by educating people or by becoming cheerleaders and positivity police or the hope police, where we have to keep things really hopeful and positive all the time. And that's not necessarily very effective either because it's not rooted in relationship.

Phipps: On a personal level, what do you do when you're in a moment of feeling overwhelmed and anxious about the state of the world and climate?

Lertzman: I do three things. First, I bring myself back into my body. I ground and do some very basic breathing and meditation to remind myself of all the people around the world that are actually deeply caring and loving and working on these issues.

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?

I bring that to my mind, because I may forget that because I'm not seeing it. So I remind myself of the company I'm in as part of a vast network of life. And then I remember my small part in that. It gives me a sense that it's not all on me.

Then I usually reach out to someone to talk and connect or just share how I'm feeling. It may not help everyone, but I'm someone who likes to be able to talk about how I'm feeling. And that really does help me feel better.

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum Type may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.